Start-up,
Technology,
Innovation.

Events to foster the entrepreneurial spirit.

arguing-1296392_1280.png?fit=1200%2C848

July 25, 2017 brian prokopowich0

When you’re involved in a contractual dispute, the process for resolving the dispute should be set out in the contract itself.

If the contract is silent on the point and you can’t resolve your dispute, you will have to use the courts. This can lead to disagreement about which courts have jurisdiction, so it is important to include clauses dealing with both governing law (what law applies) and jurisdiction (which courts can decide a case) in your contract.

To finish reading the Clausehound blog: Click Here

This blog was originally posted by Farrah Roahman

This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not create a lawyer-client relationship with the reader. It is not legal advice and should not be regarded as such. Any reliance on the information is solely at the reader’s own risk. Clausehound.com is a legal tool geared towards entrepreneurs, early-stage businesses and small businesses alike to help draft legal documents to make businesses more productive. Clausehound offers a $10 per month DIY Legal Library which hosts tens of thousands of legal clauses, contracts, articles, lawyer commentaries and instructional videos. Find Clausehound.com where you see this logo.


writing-1149962_1920.jpg?fit=1200%2C801

June 3, 2017 brian prokopowich0

Except for few specific circumstances, it is almost considered ancient to have parties to a contract physically meet up to a sign a contract in a boardroom. With the fast-paced lifestyles of most high-level executives, a more efficient method of signing contracts has been introduced: the e-Signature.

 

Although convenient, do e-signatures really create a valid and binding contract? Can e-signatures really replace hand-written signatures?

To finish reading the Clausehound blog: Click Here

This blog was originally posted by Farrah Roahman

This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not create a lawyer-client relationship with the reader. It is not legal advice and should not be regarded as such. Any reliance on the information is solely at the reader’s own risk. Clausehound.com is a legal tool geared towards entrepreneurs, early-stage businesses and small businesses alike to help draft legal documents to make businesses more productive. Clausehound offers a $10 per month DIY Legal Library which hosts tens of thousands of legal clauses, contracts, articles, lawyer commentaries and instructional videos. Find Clausehound.com where you see this logo.


vote-1804596_1920.jpg?fit=1200%2C801

May 18, 2017 brian prokopowich0

A common question that entrepreneurs/inventors have when incorporating is how to structure the business. The options for structuring a business can be overwhelming, especially when it comes to determining the number of share classes to include in your corporation. Generally, founders will initially want to issue shares to themselves, their investors, and certain employees.

To finish reading the Clausehound blog: Click Here

This blog was originally posted by Farrah Roahman

This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not create a lawyer-client relationship with the reader. It is not legal advice and should not be regarded as such. Any reliance on the information is solely at the reader’s own risk. Clausehound.com is a legal tool geared towards entrepreneurs, early-stage businesses and small businesses alike to help draft legal documents to make businesses more productive. Clausehound offers a $10 per month DIY Legal Library which hosts tens of thousands of legal clauses, contracts, articles, lawyer commentaries and instructional videos. Find Clausehound.com where you see this logo.


thought-2123970_1280.jpeg?fit=1200%2C833

May 2, 2017 brian prokopowich0
An Invention Assignment Agreement, often known as an Intellectual Property (“IP”) Transfer Agreement, is an agreement where one party assigns its intellectual property rights to the other party, either absolutely or subject to compliance with the terms of the underlying agreement.

This means the inventor (eg. software developer) assigning his/her rights can no longer claim the property as their invention. The property now belongs to the person to whom the rights have been transferred.

To finish reading the Clausehound blog: Click Here

This blog was co-authored by Vi Vo & originally posted by Farrah Roahman

This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not create a lawyer-client relationship with the reader. It is not legal advice and should not be regarded as such. Any reliance on the information is solely at the reader’s own risk. Clausehound.com is a legal tool geared towards entrepreneurs, early-stage businesses and small businesses alike to help draft legal documents to make businesses more productive. Clausehound offers a $10 per month DIY Legal Library which hosts tens of thousands of legal clauses, contracts, articles, lawyer commentaries and instructional videos. Find Clausehound.com where you see this logo.


5037975052_cacc2b16e1_o.png?fit=450%2C495

April 12, 2017 brian prokopowich0

A startup, like any new business, is inherently risky, and you’ll want the venture to be as financially and legally secure as possible. But more than that, it’s kind of your baby. It’s something that you have created, and obviously you don’t want someone taking that away from you.

So it seems to make sense to want to make every potential investor you show your work to sign a non-disclosure agreement (NDA). It’s meant to keep an investor from having the ability to pass off your hard work to someone else and cut your competitive advantage.

It is very likely however, that a potential investor will refuse to sign an NDA before you’ve even gotten halfway through sliding it across the desk towards them. In some circles, it’s actually considered a faux pas.

To finish reading the Clausehound blog: Click Here

This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not create a lawyer-client relationship with the reader. It is not legal advice and should not be regarded as such. Any reliance on the information is solely at the reader’s own risk. Clausehound.com is a legal tool geared towards entrepreneurs, early-stage businesses and small businesses alike to help draft legal documents to make businesses more productive. Clausehound offers a $10 per month DIY Legal Library which hosts tens of thousands of legal clauses, contracts, articles, lawyer commentaries and instructional videos. Find Clausehound.com where you see this logo.

Image Source: Rob Cottingham/Flickr


hand-apple-iphone-smartphone.jpeg?fit=1200%2C800

March 18, 2017 brian prokopowich0

Everyone is looking to offer that next top-selling app, but it’s not as easy as it looks. First, you have to come up with an idea that is innovative and hopefully not already taken. Once you have that idea in mind, the next hurdle is bringing that idea to fruition while avoiding theft of your hard work. Here are some tips on how you can protect yourself.

Tip #1: Prepare a Non-Disclosure Agreement

 

One basic way to protect yourself is to have a standard non-disclosure agreement prepared. To get your ideas rolling, you will have to work with many different people. It is fantastic if you can only work with people you trust, but usually that’s not the case, so don’t take any chances! A non-disclosure agreement will require anyone who works with you to discuss your confidential information only with those who need to know the information, such as yourself and team, and to not share the information with anyone else.

 

To strengthen your protection, consider a non-competition agreement as well. Unlike a non-disclosure agreement, which protects confidential information from being shared, adding a non-competition agreement would prevent anyone who has worked with you from competing against you to build the same kind of app. This agreement would be particularly useful when your ideas are in the early stages and can be easily recycled by others in other areas.

 

Check out a sample Non-Disclosure Agreement here!


Screen-Shot-2017-03-07-at-12.37.19-PM.png?fit=1200%2C944

March 7, 2017 brian prokopowich0

Serial entrepreneurs are constantly coming up with the ‘next big idea’. During the excitement of starting the process of building a business, incorporating might not be the first thing on an entrepreneur’s mind. Employees might be promised shares in a corporation that doesn’t even exist. Can the employees enforce this promise?

 

Check out Clausehound.com’s blog post on this topic to learn more!

http://blog.clausehound.com/can-founders-promise-equity-in-company-doesnt-yet-exist/?utm_source=startupTechUnleashed&utm_campaign=promiseEquity&utm_medium=referral


echo-fullres-1784-1-630.jpeg?fit=630%2C420

March 6, 2017 brian prokopowich0

Terminator, Eagle Eye, The Matrix…robots always come back to crush the humans whenever they are given too much intelligence or too much feeling…or at least they make a point to enslave all of humanity.

Where do we draw the line? We’ve begun to see ads for Google Voice and Alexa which champion the fact that AI can do anything for you from scheduling appointments to making purchases online.

With companies already there for ‘home monitoring’ or ‘make everything electronically accessible’, such as locking your door, watching your security cameras or using appliances, how far are we willing to let artificial intelligence and tech giants into our minds and homes?

I’d like to bring up a few points regarding the need for tech in our everyday activities, starting with the most obvious argument, privacy. Hopefully, bringing some things to your attention you haven’t thought of.

Let’s say you want to use Alexa to buy a desk, off of Amazon of course, they made Alexa. It seems harmless, Amazon already has your credit card info online, so what’s the difference? The concern should come from the it’s always listening argument. Phones are already doing this, that strange feeling where you’re talking about something with friends and the next time you go on a device it’s being advertised to you; that’s because Google is listening.

This may come to a shock to you, but this is how it is these days and it is being normalized. A lot of apps ask for access to your microphone for this reason, which is why I don’t have the Facebook app, because frankly I trust them the least.

If you’re okay with your Amazon AI consistently listening to you and your family in your home like Scarlett Johansson then so be it, I’m sure the government would never acquire that information if necessary (*hard wink*). At this point I have many things through Google and I’d rather not add more to the list of companies that know everything about me.

Normalizing Non-Human Consciousness

The other day I saw an ad for a robotic dog that actually woke someone up from their sleep, to ‘play with’ it. At that point I decided that was the worse product of all time. Assuming we aren’t far off from making robot dogs soft, squishy and loveable, do we really want to venture into replacing real, living things with forms of seemingly awesome tech for ease, or to replace a loved one so that we don’t have to miss them?

In case you missed it, we can already map a human consciousness into a machine, no not just like a Johnny Depp movie, but some have already done this. It seems very scary to think we could one time incorporate robots into our everyday life.

Should we rely on it for the most human things like loved ones, pets or day to day interactions…

Should We Rely so Heavily on Tech in our Everyday Lives?

I’m sure most of us are comfortable with forgetting GPS coordinates and phone numbers, leaving that up to our devices. What else should we forego? What does this do to an economy?

These are conversations we need to have. Amazon releases a lineless grocery store and boom! There goes what, 50 potential jobs? How much further are we willing to go in terms of eliminating human contact? Because it’s already causing problems in other parts of the world; Japan basically just released a virtual girlfriend-err-assistant which will send you texts during the day.

Korean women are majority not interested in marriage while half of the Japanese youth aren’t interested in sex or relationships. It’s almost like looking into the future reading those articles, as you begin to see what long term use of technology results in: lack of relationships and human interaction. When you replace sex with porn, social outings with gaming and relationships with virtual assistants, the rate of marriage, children and relationships/sex starts plummeting at rates Generation Tinder seems destined to move towards.

Less human interaction being bad for the economy is a topic not to be ignored.

It’s already happening here; millennials are having the least sex, making the least money and are staying at home longer. Maybe a valid argument can be made that all three are tied by the economy’s state, or you can use any number of social-justice positions pushed forward, but one hand seems to wash the other and perhaps we need to ask (or re-ask) the now recurring question: is technology bringing us closer together or further apart?


kaboompics.com_Chalkboard_-Social-Media1.jpg?fit=1200%2C800

March 4, 2017 brian prokopowich0

People are slowly gravitating away from the most traditional social mediums (traditional? How old am I?) and hopping on board with the new, more fresh places to be cool.

While YouTube has been around for quite some time, it is only getting more popular as users are seemingly growing tired with the censorship of sites like Facebook and Twitter (Minds is a new platform I’m liking) and pushing towards less, how do you say, politically inclined platforms; more on Facebook later.

Snapchat may be looking at a $25 billion valuation “with price guidance now likely to be $1-$2 above the $14-to-$16 estimated price range for shares”.

They have planned to sell 200 million shares at the price listed above, which would raise over $3 billion for the company. This would make it the largest IPO on American soil since Facebook went public with $16 billion in 2012. Comparatively, in 2013 Twitter got $1.8 billion, which all of course look like peanuts next to the $25 billion of Chinese super power Alibaba.

Despite the criticism of Facebook mounting by the month, they recently hit an all-time high in their stock, why?  Instagram, which they own. Instagram has been following the style of Snapchat which is spearheading its success, which begs the question: What can Facebook do to keep up?

With Twitter fading in the rear-view mirror, Facebook is doing what made Instagram popular (and Mark Zuckerberg rich), take others’ ideas and make them better. Facebook is adding new features to compete with the job search platform LinkedIn.

A company spokesman recently told Reuters “Based on behavior we’ve seen on Facebook, where many small businesses post about their job openings on their Page, we’re running a test for Page admins to create job postings and receive applications from candidates,”.

It only makes sense, although this writer would prefer for everything not be filtered through social media. Besides, anyone will tell you that a successful job interview requires going to the company’s website to learn more about them. On the other hand, most (companies) put their heart (content) on their sleeve (Facebook) anyway.

Lastly, YouTube is making giant bounds and attempting to save the cable TV industry on their own. YouTube recently captioned over 1 billion of their videos to help out those with hearing issues.

That is essentially where the nobility stops and business begins, as YouTube star Philip DeFranco announced, the media giant is going to be offering YouTube TV; a subscription-based service for, you guessed it, Cable TV.

No doubt this is because Cable TV subscription numbers are getting really low, and news-media giants are noticing no one is tuning into them anywhere near the rates they are watching Joe Rogan, Alex Jones or the aforementioned Philip DeFranco on YouTube.

A desperate attempt to get money by the networks or a noble attempt to save jobs and content variety by Google? Either way, it seems YouTube comes out on top and has nothing to lose by giving a large audience a chance to see more content.

Let us know what you think in the comments.


Screen-Shot-2017-02-24-at-9.50.43-AM.png?fit=994%2C856

February 24, 2017 brian prokopowich0

Whether a particular arbitration clause will be enforceable depends on the way in which the clause is drafted. Generally speaking, if (i) the clause is clear, (ii) arbitration is made mandatory, and (iii) the contract can otherwise be enforced, the arbitration clause will be enforceable.

Is the arbitration provision in your company’s employment agreement enforceable? Our partner organization, Clausehound.com, has shared a blog post that outlines considerations a company should take when drafting or reviewing the arbitration provision in its employment agreement. It is a valuable read for any entrepreneur or business that wants to ensure that their last line of defence in their employment contract is well drafted!

To read the original post go to: http://blog.clausehound.com/arbitration-provisions/?utm_source=startupTechUnleashed&utm_campaign=arbitrationProvisions&utm_medium=referral